Corrected in README.md, CLAUDE.md, 02-environment/README.md and
03-plc/VERSIONS.md.
The @VERSION 1.03.00 header inside the .qli files is the quickload FILE
FORMAT version, not the CI Server release. Left alone.
This also sharpens a caveat that was previously stated wrongly. The
EQP-E-DUP_ITEM rejection - an item import fails if two items share an
IO_ADDRESS - was observed on 2026-08-14 on the DEVELOPMENT machine, which
ran R1.03. Production runs R1.05, where it has never been tested. The
design still works around it by publishing level and speed in % only, and
that workaround costs nothing; but anyone wanting a second unit for a
measurement should try it on R1.05 before assuming they need a second PLC
register to carry it.
The old repo had no landing page at all - a reader arriving on the git
server saw a folder listing and CLAUDE.md, which is written for an agent.
Leads with what the repo is, that the demo is live, and that the pump
station is fiction generated from a one-page idea. Then the two machines,
the architecture invariant, and the generation chain, which is the spine
of the whole thing.
Two tables aimed at the team this is being handed to:
'Where to start' - one row per question someone actually arrives with
'What to reuse' - reuse as-is / adapt per demo / WRPS-only, so the
next demo does not start by guessing which parts
are method and which are this example
Open items are on the front page rather than buried: no acceptance tests
have been run, there is no deployment toolchain, CI Server state is
unverified, the historian has drifted, the runtime image is
irreplaceable, and live setpoint tuning is not in the repo.
Closes with what was verified against the running systems on 2026-09-02,
so the claims above are traceable rather than asserted.
Blank starting point for the CI Server + OpenPLC demo kit. Content is
brought across from the earlier WRPS working repo folder by folder, as
each part is audited.
