wrps-demo-kit/04-scada
Clio Liu 5be48b6bbb fix: CI Server on cicore1 is R1.05, not R1.03
Corrected in README.md, CLAUDE.md, 02-environment/README.md and
03-plc/VERSIONS.md.

The @VERSION 1.03.00 header inside the .qli files is the quickload FILE
FORMAT version, not the CI Server release. Left alone.

This also sharpens a caveat that was previously stated wrongly. The
EQP-E-DUP_ITEM rejection - an item import fails if two items share an
IO_ADDRESS - was observed on 2026-08-14 on the DEVELOPMENT machine, which
ran R1.03. Production runs R1.05, where it has never been tested. The
design still works around it by publishing level and speed in % only, and
that workaround costs nothing; but anyone wanting a second unit for a
measurement should try it on R1.05 before assuming they need a second PLC
register to carry it.
2026-09-02 17:34:58 +10:00
..
ciserver-backup-2026-08 fix(scada): PS_* placeholder tags out, CI Server item names in 2026-09-02 17:21:57 +10:00
hmi fix(scada): PS_* placeholder tags out, CI Server item names in 2026-09-02 17:21:57 +10:00
modbus_points fix: CI Server on cicore1 is R1.05, not R1.03 2026-09-02 17:34:58 +10:00
QUICKLOAD.md feat(scada): CI Server tag database, historian, displays 2026-09-02 17:16:18 +10:00
README.md fix(scada): PS_* placeholder tags out, CI Server item names in 2026-09-02 17:21:57 +10:00

04-scada — the CI Server side

Everything that lives on yau-poc-cicore1 (10.0.0.21): the tag database that reads the PLC, and the displays an operator looks at.

Two halves, two deployment mechanisms

This is the distinction to get straight before anything else. Conflating them is what makes this folder confusing.

Configuration Displays
What sections, items, Modbus points, historian groups the .xml screens
Lives in modbus_points/ hmi/
Deployed by dssqld — the quickload utility file copy into the displays directory
Generated from 03-plc/register-map.csv build_display.py
Binds by NSID / ID_NUMBER itemId — healed by name on import

dssqld is for configuration only. It has nothing to do with displays. See QUICKLOAD.md.

The chain

Everything derives from the PLC. The PLC side leads, always.

03-plc/src/*.st
      │ build.py
      ▼
03-plc/register-map.csv          the contract - 69 points
      │ gen_scada_points.py
      ▼
modbus_points/ci-server-points.csv   the SCADA view - 49 points, poll groups, units
      │ gen_ciserver_qli.py
      ▼
modbus_points/*.qli              6 sections · 49 Modbus points · 49 items
      │ dssqld -i
      ▼
   CI SERVER  ◄──── Modbus TCP ────  the PLC on 10.0.0.17:502
      ▲
      │ file copy
      │
hmi/out/*.xml                    6 displays
      ▲ build_display.py
      │
hmi/item-ids.csv                 49 itemIds, MEASURED from CI Server

Nothing in this chain is hand-edited. Change a register in 03-plc/build.py, rebuild, then re-run both generators. If CI Server needs a field the generators do not emit, it goes in the generator.

One exception: the historian has no generator. See modbus_points/historian/README.md.

Layout

QUICKLOAD.md            dssqld - export and import configuration
modbus_points/          the tag database (named for the protocol: CI Server
                        configures other protocols differently)
    historian/          collection groups and item bindings - HAND-MADE
hmi/                    displays, and the generator that builds them
ciserver-backup-2026-08/  ⚠️ outdated exports, evidence only - never import

⚠️ "The values on my display are not updating"

First, and before any other investigation:

Open the display in CI Server's Editor Module and validate it. Then report what happened.

Validation resolves every connection by name and repairs the file. It fixes the overwhelmingly common cause in seconds — an itemId that no longer matches, which happens every time the items are re-imported. CI Server recreates items on import rather than updating them in place, so every id in every display moves at once, and every value goes dead together.

That simultaneity is the signature: everything dying at the same moment is ids, not communications.

Only once validation has been ruled out, work down these:

Symptom Cause
Some values dead, others fine Those items were never measured. Harvest the ids — see hmi/DEPLOY.md.
Every analogue reads 0, always You are polling %IW/%IX (FC04/FC02). Those are field inputs; in the simulation build nothing writes them. Live values are in the %QW block (FC03).
Values frozen at a plausible number Communications stopped. Is the container up? Is a program running? The runtime opens its Modbus slave only while a program runs — a stopped program means port 502 refuses.
Values moving but wrong Addressing. %MW starts at holding register 1024, not 0. A wrong-by-1024 read succeeds and returns plausible nonsense.
Alarm word goes negative %QW17 must be read unsigned. Bit 15 does not fit a signed INT.

What this repo cannot tell you: whether CI Server's own poll groups are actually scanning. That lives on cicore1. If the PLC polls correctly with 05-tests/verify_modbus.py and the ids are good, that is the remaining place to look.

Status

Points and items Imported and reading live PLC values (2026-08-14), verified against a direct Modbus read
Generators Verified reproducible 2026-09-02 — ci-server-points.csv and all three .qli regenerate byte-identically
Displays Six built; build_display.py runs clean
Historian 3 groups, 49 bindings — hand-made, and the live rates differ from these files. The server runs WRPS_ONE_SEC at 5 s and WRPS_THIRTY_SEC at 30 s. See modbus_points/historian/README.md.
CI Server state ⚠️ Unverified. No access to cicore1 during this audit. Everything here is what the repo believes, not what the server holds.

Two things left for you

  • Alarm and trend limits. Every item imports with alarming off and limits at 0. Which points alarm, at what threshold and priority, is engineering judgement about the plant — not something to derive from a register map.
  • Re-export the configuration from cicore1 and diff it against this folder. Until then, ciserver-backup-2026-08/ is the only record of the server's own state, and it is known to disagree with modbus_points/historian/.