Correct two counts that disagreed with the files they describe

The exam: eval/testset.jsonl holds 78 cases (A10 H28 L8 N5 P10 R10 T5 U2).
workflow-map.html called it a 75-question exam in the two places it states
the current total. Corrected. The two sentences describing how the exam
"grew from 67 questions to 75" are left alone - that step is historically
correct: 67 plus the eight live-model failures is 75, and the Phase 5
findings H26, H27 and H31 took it to 78 afterwards.

The env files: .env.example said TWO 0600 files under ~/ai/ and listed
pg-ai.env and api.env, but its own line 105 refers to langfuse.env, and
README.md, scripts/deploy.sh and compose/langfuse-compose.yml all use
three. The header was simply wrong; langfuse.env is now named in it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Claude 2026-09-01 16:22:23 +10:00
parent 61ddce808f
commit 45034eb4d1
2 changed files with 6 additions and 5 deletions

View file

@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
# ============================================================================= # =============================================================================
# .env.example — every key, no values. Committed deliberately. # .env.example — every key, no values. Committed deliberately.
# #
# On lin001 these live as TWO 0600 files under ~/ai/, never in Git: # On lin001 these live as THREE 0600 files under ~/ai/, never in Git:
# ~/ai/pg-ai.env the POSTGRES_* / AGENT_DB_* block # ~/ai/pg-ai.env the POSTGRES_* / AGENT_DB_* block
# ~/ai/langfuse.env the Langfuse SALT / NEXTAUTH_SECRET block (see below)
# ~/ai/api.env everything else # ~/ai/api.env everything else
# Follow the ~/authelia/authelia.env precedent: chmod 0600, owned by azureuser. # Follow the ~/authelia/authelia.env precedent: chmod 0600, owned by azureuser.
# ============================================================================= # =============================================================================

View file

@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ shows the control-room machine opening the page on 28 August, the day the rule w
three questions on 31 August, each answered.</td></tr> three questions on 31 August, each answered.</td></tr>
<tr><td class="ph">8</td> <tr><td class="ph">8</td>
<td><b>The exam</b> &mdash; 75 engineer-checked questions run end to end and scored</td> <td><b>The exam</b> &mdash; 78 engineer-checked questions run end to end and scored</td>
<td><span class="badge b-blocked">Runnable, and never run</span></td> <td><span class="badge b-blocked">Runnable, and never run</span></td>
<td><b>Nothing is blocking this and it has still not been done.</b> The model account arrived on 27 <td><b>Nothing is blocking this and it has still not been done.</b> The model account arrived on 27
August, so both AI steps can be scored; no scorecard has ever been produced. The set covers 28 August, so both AI steps can be scored; no scorecard has ever been produced. The set covers 28
@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ returns that document&rsquo;s heading, purpose and prerequisites and withholds t
The rulebook already refused instruction language and still does; this removes the temptation The rulebook already refused instruction language and still does; this removes the temptation
rather than relying on catching it.</li> rather than relying on catching it.</li>
<li><b>What it still does not prove:</b> whether the labelling and wording are <em>good enough</em>. <li><b>What it still does not prove:</b> whether the labelling and wording are <em>good enough</em>.
They work; they are not yet scored. The 75-question exam can now be run and has not been. And no They work; they are not yet scored. The 78-question exam can now be run and has not been. And no
operator has yet sat at a control-room PC and got an answer &mdash; the one check that cannot be operator has yet sat at a control-room PC and got an answer &mdash; the one check that cannot be
done from here.</li> done from here.</li>
<li><b>Found today, and worth repeating:</b> the most obvious question at this station &mdash; <li><b>Found today, and worth repeating:</b> the most obvious question at this station &mdash;