Hand-verifying the measures against the fixtures on lin001, per the Phase 5
gate. Two of them had never executed anywhere, and both failed outright rather
than returning a wrong number - which is the good version of this, but they
failed at the point an operator asks a question, not at review.
- time_weighted_avg put LEAD() inside SUM(). Postgres rejects that flatly:
"aggregate function calls cannot contain window function calls". The per
sample duration now comes from the cube's source query, which changes
sql_table to sql, and the measure just sums value * duration over duration.
The last sample of each tag gets a NULL duration and SUM skips it, which is
correct - how long it stood is not yet known.
This is the measure that matters most later. On the regular one-minute
fixtures it agrees with avg_value to thirteen decimal places
(42.45934027777778 against 42.45934027777775), which proves it is wired up
and proves nothing about imh, where the deadband makes samples irregular
and the two will not agree. Re-verify it there.
- p95_value applied the quality filter through a Cube measure `filters:`
block, which lands outside the aggregate and cannot work on an ordered-set
aggregate: "column process_values.quality must appear in the GROUP BY
clause". Folded into the CASE inside PERCENTILE_CONT, whose NULL handling
does the exclusion.
Also: the priority dimension said only SPILL and PUMP_TRIP are priority 1,
while the data has LEVEL_SIGNAL_FAULT at priority 1 too - correctly, losing the
level signal on a well that can spill is a priority 1 condition. That comment is
the line an engineer reads when checking a priority_1_count, so it disagreeing
with the data matters more than its length suggests.
eval cases H24 and H25 record the two failures, added before the fix.
Verified against hand-written SQL on the same pinned windows: p95_value
61.104999999999976 and time_weighted_avg 42.45934027777778 both match to the
floating point tail, as do sample_count, avg_value, max_value, min_value,
seconds_above_high_level_alarm (7680 = 128 samples x 60) and every measure in
alarms and operations.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
d6b6f4f116