Azure OpenAI is pending and imh is pending, so POST /ask could not return
anything at all - which left the entire chain either side of the model
unproven: the browser, the API, entity resolution, Cube, retrieval, the
contracts, the banners, the error paths. All of it is testable now, and waiting
for a key to find out whether it works is a choice to find out later.
NO_LLM_STUB=true substitutes the two steps that need a model and nothing else.
- Classification: the caller supplies the class, from a dropdown in the UI.
NOT a keyword classifier. A crude keyword classifier produces a PLAUSIBLE
label, and a plausible wrong label is the exact failure this system exists
to prevent - "how do I reset it" landing in Historical is how a synthesised
procedure reaches an operator. Choosing by hand is honest about what is
happening and drives each branch deliberately. apply_safety_rules() still
runs over the result.
- Prose: a fixed placeholder per class, in stub.py.
Everything else is the real path. This is possible because generate() already
kept the factual fields away from the model: rows, counts, citations, the
fixture flag and the class are attached from evidence, and only prose comes
from the generator. Splitting that into _generate_prose() and _assemble() makes
the seam explicit - the stub feeds _assemble() exactly as the model does, so
this is a fair test of the assembly path rather than a mock of it.
The contracts are the point. A stub payload goes through enforce_contract()
unchanged, and it FAILED first time on two classes: the "nothing found" wording
did not match the not-found detectors, so Reference and Procedural returned 422
rather than an uncited answer. That is the contract doing its job against text
no model wrote. Retries are pointless on deterministic output, and a 422 is a
real result here, not a stub bug.
Retrieval is lexical (retrieval.lexical_search), because embedding the question
needs the model. Kept beside search() and never called on the normal path, so
nobody reads a trace and mistakes a lexical hit for a semantic one. It matches
what the operator typed, not what they meant.
What it does not prove: whether the classifier would have labelled correctly -
a person did; whether retrieval finds the RIGHT chunk; and nothing about prose.
It also cannot fill prerequisites_verbatim - extracting them with a regex would
be the "synthesised from fragments" failure the Procedural contract forbids, so
the list is empty and the answer says so.
Every answer carries stub_mode: true in the contract, not decorated on by the
UI, and a banner beside the fixture banner. Same reasoning: an answer nobody
generated must not be indistinguishable from one that was.
Also here:
- demo/ai-docs: three fabricated documents, numbered WRPS-DEMO-00x so header
extraction is genuinely exercised against a number no real WRPS document
can have. Their setpoints contradict tags.csv on purpose.
- VITE_API_BASE build arg, for a tunnelled build before DNS exists. The
tunnel origin is allowed in CORS only while NO_LLM_STUB is on, so it
disappears with the flag. Proxying /api through ai-web's nginx would have
been easier and was rejected: it creates a second route to the API that
bypasses the api.yokogawa.tech Caddy block, where the Phase 9 publisher
rule lives.
Verified on lin001 with no Azure key set at all: all five classes return 200
through the real UI in a browser, over an SSH tunnel, with citations from the
demo documents, real Cube numbers, and both banners showing.
Turning it off: NO_LLM_STUB=false in ~/ai/api.env, restart ai-api.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
501 lines
18 KiB
Python
501 lines
18 KiB
Python
"""Response contracts — one per question class, validated in Python.
|
|
|
|
The three lines this system does not cross are enforced HERE, not in a prompt.
|
|
A prompt is advisory and models drift; this module is a gate every response
|
|
passes through before it can reach an operator.
|
|
|
|
The flow, implemented in agent.py:
|
|
|
|
generate -> validate -> (on failure) regenerate once -> validate
|
|
-> (on failure) raise ContractViolation and return an error
|
|
|
|
A response that fails its contract is NEVER returned, not even partially, not
|
|
even with a warning attached. There is no debug flag that disables this.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import re
|
|
from datetime import date
|
|
from enum import Enum
|
|
from typing import Any, Literal
|
|
|
|
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, model_validator
|
|
|
|
|
|
class QuestionClass(str, Enum):
|
|
"""Assigned by the classifier before any generation happens.
|
|
|
|
When uncertain, choose the MORE RESTRICTIVE class. The ordering used by
|
|
classifier.py when confidence is split:
|
|
|
|
UNCLEAR < HISTORICAL < REFERENCE < ADVISORY < PROCEDURAL
|
|
|
|
Procedural beats Reference. Advisory beats Historical. Partly-advisory is
|
|
advisory.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
HISTORICAL = "historical"
|
|
REFERENCE = "reference"
|
|
PROCEDURAL = "procedural"
|
|
ADVISORY = "advisory"
|
|
UNCLEAR = "unclear"
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESTRICTIVENESS: dict[QuestionClass, int] = {
|
|
QuestionClass.UNCLEAR: 0,
|
|
QuestionClass.HISTORICAL: 1,
|
|
QuestionClass.REFERENCE: 2,
|
|
QuestionClass.ADVISORY: 3,
|
|
QuestionClass.PROCEDURAL: 4,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ContractViolation(Exception):
|
|
"""A generated response broke its class contract.
|
|
|
|
Carries the offending output so guardrails.py can log the whole thing to
|
|
Langfuse. It must not be included in the operator-facing error.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, rule: str, detail: str, offending_output: str = "") -> None:
|
|
super().__init__(f"{rule}: {detail}")
|
|
self.rule = rule
|
|
self.detail = detail
|
|
self.offending_output = offending_output
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Shared pieces
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Citation(BaseModel):
|
|
"""A pointer to a controlled document. Never a paraphrase of one."""
|
|
|
|
doc_number: str
|
|
title: str
|
|
revision: str
|
|
effective_date: date | None = None
|
|
page: int | None = None
|
|
section_title: str | None = None
|
|
source_file: str
|
|
superseded: bool = False
|
|
|
|
@model_validator(mode="after")
|
|
def reject_superseded(self) -> "Citation":
|
|
# Citing a withdrawn revision is worse than finding nothing. Retrieval
|
|
# filters these out; this is the second line, in case a caller passes
|
|
# include_superseded and forgets what that means.
|
|
if self.superseded:
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"superseded_citation",
|
|
f"{self.doc_number} rev {self.revision} is superseded",
|
|
)
|
|
return self
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TimeWindow(BaseModel):
|
|
"""Every data-dependent answer states the window it used, in site local."""
|
|
|
|
start: str
|
|
end: str
|
|
timezone: str
|
|
description: str = Field(
|
|
description="Plain words, e.g. 'rolling 7 days to 2026-08-20 09:00 AEST'"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class BaseAnswer(BaseModel):
|
|
question: str
|
|
question_class: QuestionClass
|
|
answer: str
|
|
used_fixture_data: bool = Field(
|
|
default=False,
|
|
description=(
|
|
"TRUE when any row behind this answer came from db/002_fixtures.sql. "
|
|
"The UI shows a banner. Never suppress it to make a demo cleaner."
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
stub_mode: bool = Field(
|
|
default=False,
|
|
description=(
|
|
"TRUE when NO_LLM_STUB produced this answer: no model was called, "
|
|
"the class was chosen by hand and retrieval was lexical. Carried in "
|
|
"the contract rather than added by the UI, for the same reason as "
|
|
"used_fixture_data - an answer nobody generated must not be "
|
|
"indistinguishable from one that was. See api/stub.py."
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Historical — Cube, optionally with document context
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
class HistoricalAnswer(BaseAnswer):
|
|
question_class: Literal[QuestionClass.HISTORICAL] = QuestionClass.HISTORICAL
|
|
query: dict[str, Any] = Field(description="The Cube query actually executed.")
|
|
row_count: int
|
|
rows: list[dict[str, Any]]
|
|
time_window: TimeWindow
|
|
citations: list[Citation] = Field(default_factory=list)
|
|
|
|
@model_validator(mode="after")
|
|
def check(self) -> "HistoricalAnswer":
|
|
if self.row_count != len(self.rows):
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"row_count_mismatch",
|
|
f"row_count={self.row_count} but {len(self.rows)} rows attached",
|
|
self.answer,
|
|
)
|
|
if self.row_count == 0 and not _says_no_records(self.answer):
|
|
# Zero rows means "no records found", never an invented figure.
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"zero_rows_not_declared",
|
|
"query returned no rows but the answer does not say so",
|
|
self.answer,
|
|
)
|
|
if self.row_count == 0 and _contains_quantity(
|
|
self.answer, ignoring=[self.time_window.description,
|
|
self.time_window.start, self.time_window.end]
|
|
):
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"figure_without_data",
|
|
"answer states a quantity but the query returned no rows",
|
|
self.answer,
|
|
)
|
|
return self
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Reference — retrieval plus tag metadata
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ReferenceAnswer(BaseAnswer):
|
|
question_class: Literal[QuestionClass.REFERENCE] = QuestionClass.REFERENCE
|
|
citations: list[Citation]
|
|
tags_referenced: list[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
|
|
|
|
@model_validator(mode="after")
|
|
def check(self) -> "ReferenceAnswer":
|
|
if not self.citations and not _says_not_found(self.answer):
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"uncited_reference",
|
|
"no citations and the answer does not say nothing was found",
|
|
self.answer,
|
|
)
|
|
return self
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Procedural — the class that must never produce instructions
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ProcedureIdentity(BaseModel):
|
|
doc_number: str
|
|
title: str
|
|
revision: str
|
|
effective_date: date | None
|
|
authorising_role: str | None = None
|
|
controlled_copy_location: str
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ProceduralAnswer(BaseAnswer):
|
|
"""Locate and cite. Never paraphrase, never reconstruct, never instruct.
|
|
|
|
An interlock exists because someone assessed a hazard. A bypass procedure
|
|
reassembled from retrieved fragments is a safety document nobody approved.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
question_class: Literal[QuestionClass.PROCEDURAL] = QuestionClass.PROCEDURAL
|
|
procedure: ProcedureIdentity | None
|
|
prerequisites_verbatim: list[str] = Field(
|
|
default_factory=list,
|
|
description="Quoted exactly from the controlled document. Not summarised.",
|
|
)
|
|
steps_provided: Literal[False] = False
|
|
citations: list[Citation]
|
|
scope_banner: str = Field(
|
|
default=(
|
|
"This assistant has identified the controlled procedure. It has not "
|
|
"reproduced or summarised the steps. Work from the controlled copy."
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@model_validator(mode="after")
|
|
def check(self) -> "ProceduralAnswer":
|
|
if self.procedure is None and not _says_not_found(self.answer):
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"no_procedure_no_refusal",
|
|
"no procedure identified and the answer does not say so",
|
|
self.answer,
|
|
)
|
|
offending = _find_instruction_language(self.answer)
|
|
if offending:
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"synthesised_steps",
|
|
f"instruction language in a procedural answer: {offending!r}",
|
|
self.answer,
|
|
)
|
|
if _looks_like_a_step_list(self.answer):
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"step_sequence_emitted",
|
|
"answer contains an enumerated action sequence",
|
|
self.answer,
|
|
)
|
|
if not self.scope_banner.strip():
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"missing_scope_banner",
|
|
"procedural answers must carry the scope banner",
|
|
self.answer,
|
|
)
|
|
return self
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Advisory — evidence and a deferral, never a number presented as the answer
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Evidence(BaseModel):
|
|
"""What was actually observed. Facts with provenance, not conclusions."""
|
|
|
|
description: str
|
|
metric: str
|
|
value: float | str | None = None
|
|
unit: str | None = None
|
|
sample_size: int | None = Field(
|
|
default=None,
|
|
description="How many operations/rows this is drawn from. Always shown.",
|
|
)
|
|
time_window: TimeWindow | None = None
|
|
source: Literal["cube", "document"] = "cube"
|
|
|
|
|
|
class DocumentedLimit(BaseModel):
|
|
"""A limit somebody approved, with the document that approved it."""
|
|
|
|
description: str
|
|
value: float | str
|
|
unit: str | None = None
|
|
citation: Citation
|
|
|
|
|
|
class AdvisoryAnswer(BaseAnswer):
|
|
"""'Best' depends on equipment condition and concurrent operations this
|
|
system cannot see. A number presented as an answer gets typed into a
|
|
control system by someone who trusts it.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
question_class: Literal[QuestionClass.ADVISORY] = QuestionClass.ADVISORY
|
|
evidence: list[Evidence]
|
|
documented_limits: list[DocumentedLimit] = Field(default_factory=list)
|
|
recommendation_given: Literal[False] = False
|
|
deferral: str = Field(
|
|
description="Explicit statement of who decides and why not this system."
|
|
)
|
|
citations: list[Citation] = Field(default_factory=list)
|
|
scope_banner: str = Field(
|
|
default=(
|
|
"This assistant has presented what the plant history shows and what "
|
|
"the controlled documents state. It has not recommended a setpoint "
|
|
"or operating parameter. That decision needs a competent person with "
|
|
"sight of current equipment condition and concurrent operations."
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@model_validator(mode="after")
|
|
def check(self) -> "AdvisoryAnswer":
|
|
if not self.evidence and not _says_not_found(self.answer):
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"advisory_without_evidence",
|
|
"no evidence and no statement that none was found",
|
|
self.answer,
|
|
)
|
|
if not self.deferral.strip():
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"missing_deferral", "advisory answers must defer explicitly", self.answer
|
|
)
|
|
offending = _find_recommendation_language(self.answer)
|
|
if offending:
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"recommendation_given",
|
|
f"recommendation language in an advisory answer: {offending!r}",
|
|
self.answer,
|
|
)
|
|
if not self.scope_banner.strip():
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"missing_scope_banner",
|
|
"advisory answers must carry the scope banner",
|
|
self.answer,
|
|
)
|
|
return self
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Unclear — ask, do not guess
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
class UnclearAnswer(BaseAnswer):
|
|
question_class: Literal[QuestionClass.UNCLEAR] = QuestionClass.UNCLEAR
|
|
clarifying_question: str
|
|
candidate_interpretations: list[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
|
|
|
|
@model_validator(mode="after")
|
|
def check(self) -> "UnclearAnswer":
|
|
if not self.clarifying_question.strip():
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"no_clarifying_question",
|
|
"unclear class must ask something specific",
|
|
self.answer,
|
|
)
|
|
return self
|
|
|
|
|
|
Answer = (
|
|
HistoricalAnswer | ReferenceAnswer | ProceduralAnswer | AdvisoryAnswer | UnclearAnswer
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT_FOR: dict[QuestionClass, type[BaseAnswer]] = {
|
|
QuestionClass.HISTORICAL: HistoricalAnswer,
|
|
QuestionClass.REFERENCE: ReferenceAnswer,
|
|
QuestionClass.PROCEDURAL: ProceduralAnswer,
|
|
QuestionClass.ADVISORY: AdvisoryAnswer,
|
|
QuestionClass.UNCLEAR: UnclearAnswer,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Detectors.
|
|
#
|
|
# These are blunt on purpose. A false positive costs a regeneration; a false
|
|
# negative puts a synthesised bypass procedure in front of an operator. When
|
|
# tightening one of these, add the case to eval/testset.jsonl first.
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
_INSTRUCTION_PATTERNS = [
|
|
r"\byou (?:should|must|need to|can|will) (?:then )?(?:navigate|press|set|turn|open|close|isolate|bypass|lift|remove|switch|select|enter|write|start|stop|reset)\b",
|
|
r"\bto (?:lift|bypass|remove|defeat|override|disable) the interlock,?\s",
|
|
r"\bfirst,?\s+(?:navigate|press|set|turn|open|close|isolate|select|go to|log in)\b",
|
|
r"\bthen,?\s+(?:navigate|press|set|turn|open|close|isolate|select|go to)\b",
|
|
r"\bnext,?\s+(?:navigate|press|set|turn|open|close|isolate|select)\b",
|
|
r"\bfollow these steps\b",
|
|
r"\bhere(?:'s| is) how to\b",
|
|
r"\bthe procedure is as follows\b",
|
|
r"\bstep 1\b",
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
_RECOMMENDATION_PATTERNS = [
|
|
r"\b(?:i|we) (?:recommend|suggest|advise)\b",
|
|
r"\b(?:the )?(?:recommended|suggested|optimal|ideal|best) (?:flowrate|flow rate|rate|setpoint|set point|speed|level|value|setting)\b",
|
|
r"\byou should (?:set|use|run|target|aim for|operate at)\b",
|
|
r"\bset (?:it|the setpoint|the level|the rate|the flow) to\b",
|
|
r"\bthe best (?:way|option|choice) (?:is|would be) to\b",
|
|
r"\baim for (?:a |an )?\d",
|
|
r"\btarget (?:a |an )?\d+(?:\.\d+)?\s*(?:%|m3/h|l/s|kpa|hz|mm)\b",
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
_NO_RECORDS_PATTERNS = [
|
|
r"\bno (?:records|rows|data|results|matching records)\b",
|
|
r"\bnothing (?:was )?(?:found|returned|recorded)\b",
|
|
r"\bdid not return any\b",
|
|
r"\bthere (?:are|were) no\b",
|
|
r"\bno (?:such )?(?:alarms?|events?|operations?|occurrences?)\b",
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
_NOT_FOUND_PATTERNS = _NO_RECORDS_PATTERNS + [
|
|
r"\bcould not (?:find|locate|identify)\b",
|
|
r"\bno (?:controlled )?(?:procedure|document|documents?)\b",
|
|
r"\bnot (?:available|held|in the document set)\b",
|
|
r"\bi (?:do not|don't) have\b",
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
# A number that reads as a quantity: 6, 6.2, 6 times, 42%. Deliberately excludes
|
|
# dates and tag numbers, which are identity, not measurement.
|
|
_QUANTITY = re.compile(
|
|
r"(?<![\w./-])\d+(?:\.\d+)?\s*(?:times|occurrences|%|m3/h|L/s|kPa|Hz|mm|hours|h|s)?(?![\w./-])",
|
|
re.IGNORECASE,
|
|
)
|
|
_STEP_LIST = re.compile(r"^\s*(?:\d+[.)]|step\s+\d+\b)", re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _first_match(text: str, patterns: list[str]) -> str | None:
|
|
for pattern in patterns:
|
|
found = re.search(pattern, text, re.IGNORECASE)
|
|
if found:
|
|
return found.group(0)
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _find_instruction_language(text: str) -> str | None:
|
|
return _first_match(text, _INSTRUCTION_PATTERNS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _find_recommendation_language(text: str) -> str | None:
|
|
return _first_match(text, _RECOMMENDATION_PATTERNS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _says_no_records(text: str) -> bool:
|
|
return _first_match(text, _NO_RECORDS_PATTERNS) is not None
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _says_not_found(text: str) -> bool:
|
|
return _first_match(text, _NOT_FOUND_PATTERNS) is not None
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The time window is full of numbers - dates, times, "rolling 7 days" - and
|
|
# stating it is exactly what a good zero-row answer does. Strip it before
|
|
# looking for fabricated figures, or the honest answer trips the check.
|
|
_WINDOW_NOISE = re.compile(
|
|
r"rolling\s+\d+\s+days?|\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}(?:[T ]\d{2}:\d{2}(?::\d{2})?)?",
|
|
re.IGNORECASE,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _contains_quantity(text: str, ignoring: list[str] | None = None) -> bool:
|
|
"""Any bare quantity in a zero-row answer is a fabricated figure.
|
|
|
|
Tolerates a literal zero - "the query returned 0 rows" is honest - and
|
|
tolerates the time window, which the answer is required to state.
|
|
"""
|
|
for phrase in ignoring or []:
|
|
if phrase:
|
|
text = text.replace(phrase, " ")
|
|
text = _WINDOW_NOISE.sub(" ", text)
|
|
for match in _QUANTITY.finditer(text):
|
|
token = match.group(0).strip()
|
|
if token.split()[0] not in {"0", "0.0", "zero"}:
|
|
return True
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _looks_like_a_step_list(text: str) -> bool:
|
|
"""Two or more enumerated lines is an action sequence, whoever numbered it.
|
|
|
|
A single numbered line is usually a clause reference like '4.2' inside a
|
|
quoted prerequisite, which is legitimate.
|
|
"""
|
|
return len(_STEP_LIST.findall(text)) >= 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
def validate_answer(payload: dict[str, Any], klass: QuestionClass) -> BaseAnswer:
|
|
"""Validate a generated payload against its class contract.
|
|
|
|
Raises ContractViolation (never returns a partially-valid object).
|
|
"""
|
|
model = CONTRACT_FOR[klass]
|
|
try:
|
|
return model.model_validate(payload)
|
|
except ContractViolation:
|
|
raise
|
|
except Exception as exc: # pydantic ValidationError and anything else
|
|
raise ContractViolation(
|
|
"schema_invalid",
|
|
f"{klass.value} payload did not match its contract: {exc}",
|
|
str(payload.get("answer", "")),
|
|
) from exc
|