An operator standing at the SCADA console should not complete a Duo push to
ask a question, and nobody outside the plant should reach the assistant at
all. The ai.yokogawa.tech Caddy block now admits remote_ip 10.0.0.21
(yau-poc-cicore1, static) and returns 403 to everything else. Applied on
lin001 2026-08-28; snapshot at ~/Caddyfile.bak-ai-scadaonly-20260828.
This also settles why the console could not reach the assistant at all:
auth.yokogawa.tech has no pinpoint record on the DC, so a LAN browser got a
correct 302 to the portal and then died on DNS. It went unnoticed because the
device agents write to Influx over the /api/v2/write MFA bypass and never
touch the portal - no browser had ever hit Authelia from inside the VNet.
Verified before applying that an IP matcher can work here: Caddy sees real
client addresses, and WireGuard peers arrive masqueraded as 172.19.0.6 so
they do not match and are refused along with the internet.
What this costs, recorded in section 14 as a shortcut and not as a security
control: it is an IP allowlist on a flat network with no OT/IT boundary, so
anything that can take 10.0.0.21 inherits unauthenticated access; Langfuse
traces are now anonymous, so there is no record of who asked what; and the
assistant is out of browser reach over the VPN. It is in scope for the
section 2 OT/safety review, which is still outstanding.
api.yokogawa.tech is unchanged and still fully gated - Phase 9 publishing
depends on Remote-User/Remote-Groups and stays there. The now-inert
ai.yokogawa.tech entry in the Authelia rule is deliberately left in place so
restoring the gate is a Caddy reload rather than an Authelia restart that
logs out every user on the host.
verify.sh treats 403-from-lin001 as the pass for the deny arm and states
plainly that the allow arm can only be proved from cicore1.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Operators cannot add a document today: ingestion is CLI-only, needs a host
login and a TTY for confirm_header(), /datadisk/ai-docs is mounted read-only,
ai-api has no identity, and nothing in the stack has a role that can write
doc_chunks. This designs the way in, the way out, and control over what is in
the retrieval pool. Design and schema only - no router, worker or UI code yet.
Documents in (16.1-16.9, db/004):
upload -> pre-scan -> review -> approve -> published, with the header
confirmation moved from a terminal prompt to a review screen and recorded
rather than discarded. A CHECK constraint refuses an approved row without a
confirmed number, revision and effective date, so an API bug cannot skip it.
Three roles: agent_ro unchanged, uploads_rw writes the queue only, ingest_rw
writes doc_chunks and has no HTTP surface.
Documents out (16.10-16.11, db/005):
--supersede needs a revision to keep, so a cancelled procedure cannot be
withdrawn at all. Adds withdraw (immediate, reversible, audited), restore
(refused while another revision is live) and purge (off by default). A
column grant plus a trigger let the web-facing role make a document less
citable and never more.
The pool (16.13-16.15, db/006):
pool_enabled, orthogonal to superseded: one is a claim about the document,
the other about the corpus. Retrieval requires both, so re-enabling a
withdrawn document does not make it citable. Named profiles and a
per-request override let a demo trim the corpus without mutating state on a
shared live host, and every reduced-pool answer carries a banner with the
document count, following the used_fixture_data precedent.
Two existing defects found and documented while designing this:
- ai-ingest takes PGUSER=agent_ro from api.env, a SELECT-only role, so the
Phase 3 command in the README cannot write doc_chunks (16.1).
- ingest_file() always inserts superseded = FALSE, so `--all` re-ingests a
superseded revision as live. --supersede survives only until the next bulk
run (16.10).
One commit rather than three: the upload, withdrawal and pool designs
interleave in the same spec, README and compose files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Verified on lin001 over SSH on 2026-08-20, read-only:
- Port 502 is bound to 10.0.0.17, not 0.0.0.0, so unauthenticated Modbus is
not internet-reachable at the Docker level. This was an open risk in §3 and
an unchecked item in §15; it is now a confirmation. openplc-runtime also
publishes 8443 (the Runtime web UI) on the same private address, which the
spec did not mention.
- openplc-runtime is not the only published port on the host: caddy, wireguard,
mosquitto and chirpstack-gateway-bridge all publish on 0.0.0.0. The
no-published-ports rule still applies in full to what we build, but the
"one deliberate exception" framing was wrong and invited over-reading.
- Port 22 is open to the internet. Added to §15 as an open item for the same
NSG review.
- 21 containers running, not 22; no stopped containers.
- /datadisk is 46% used with InfluxDB at 55 GB, up from 43%/52 GB. Recorded
the growth rate so it can be budgeted for.
CLAUDE.md restates two of these rules and is updated to match.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Build spec and host brief carried in from C:\Claude and WRPS/02-env; the
plant model (equipment, tags, alarm bitmask, enums, unit conversions) is
derived from WRPS/04-plc/register-map.csv, WRPS/05-scada/modbus/scada-points.csv
and WRPS-CTL-003.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
