ci-server-engineer/knowledge/r105-verification.md

R1.05 verification checklist

Two kinds of R1.05 checks are open after the read-only re-check of 2026-10-08:

• Not tested: the function is not available on the R1.05 test server, so it cannot be tested there at all. The content stays "from docs" and is marked not tested with the reason. Nothing to do until a suitable system exists.
• Awaiting user verification: Claude could not run the step itself (refused as a remote command, needs an administrator, needs the GUI). Claude prepared the steps and expected results below; the user runs them on the server or in the GUI and sends the output or a screenshot, and Claude records the result in the task file and in progress.md.

All steps below are read-only: they open forms or print information and save nothing. Close every form with Cancel.

Not tested on the R1.05 test server

Area	Reason	Where marked
IT Security Tool (version 2.0 / 3.0), CIX_ groups, CTM_PROCESS, LAPS, GPO import	Tool not installed; Windows Server 2025 is not supported by the tool	skill installation-security, C10/C30 summaries
Vnet/IP drivers, VAGW Bossd	No Vnet/IP card; not supported on Server 2025	skill installation-security, C10 summary
Upgrade from R1.03/R1.04 with the automatic configuration merge (jupgutl, -c argument)	Fresh R1.05 install, no upgrade to observe; an upgrade test needs a separate machine	C10 summary, ISS-086
CI Server with PRM	No PRM	C10 summary, ISS-090
IEC 60870-5-104 and IEC 61850 (EQT managers, report control blocks, eqtdbg, eqtfrcscn)	No device and no EQT line on the server	skill equipment, L40/L41 summaries, ISS-076–079
OPC A&E OPXAES_DIR_ALM, OPC UA PubSub, imported information model	Needs another client/server or extra server instances	skill data-access, ISS-085

Awaiting user verification

V1. eqpdbg main info (skill equipment, L40 summary §3): done 2026-10-08

Run by Claude over ssh at the user's request; output as expected (recorded in the L40 summary).

On the R1.05 test server, in a normal command prompt:

eqpdbg 0 EQPMDC

Type 1 (Get main info), Enter, read the output, then -1 (Exit). Expected: line type 107, the Modbus line(s) attached, scan interval (tick) in ms, number of slaves, line load %. Do not choose any other action number. Send a screenshot of the output.

V2. Setup check script (skill installation-security, task setup-check.md): done 2026-10-08

Run by Claude (temporary copy, deleted afterwards): 12 OK, 5 CHECK, 20 DIFF after fixing the firewall check (see setup-check.md).

Copy tools/setup_check.ps1 from this repo to a scratch folder on the server, run it in an elevated Windows PowerShell, then delete the copy:

powershell -NoProfile -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File setup_check.ps1

Expected (from the one-by-one checks of 2026-10-08): CI Server 1.05.00 OK; Windows Server 2025 Datacenter shown as not in the list; DIFF for firewall domain profile, Defender, automatic updates, defrag / component cleanup, page file, .NET 3.5, missing CIX_ groups; CHECK lines for IT security. Send the result table (screenshot or text).

V3. Engineering Module forms (skill data-access): form definitions checked 2026-10-08

Claude has no GUI access to the server. Checked instead in the installed form definitions (tls\wap\cfg): the main menu has the OPC UA Information Model Mapper action (dataset UASERVER_MAPPER_DF); each user in the project tree has Add API key (dataset API_KEYS_DF); the OPC UA client point form has READ_NODE_INFO and REBROWSE; the method form has node ID type, parent object node ID, manual argument fields and no process-area field. Screenshots of the open forms are optional.

In the Engineering Module on the server (log on as a user with engineering rights), open each form below, take a screenshot, and close it with Cancel:

1. Tools › OPC UA Information Model Mapper: the mapper window opens (shows New Mapping).
2. Authorisation › Users, any user: the Add API Key function exists (do not create a key).
3. An OPC UA client point form (New on an OPC UA station is enough to see it, then Cancel): the checkbox Read additional node information exists.
4. An OPC UA client method form: fields for node ID type, Options tab (parent object node ID) and Arguments tab; no process-area field.

If no OPC UA client line exists on the server, steps 3–4 need one: skip them and say so.

V4. CI-Eng-Sample on the R1.05 test server: reduced load tested 2026-10-08

The user approved a reduced load (no history group, no user CIENG, no layouts/displays) that is removed again afterwards. Scripts: examples/CI-Eng-Sample/shared/.

• Load: 0 errors in every step; R1.05 accepts the sample's @VERSION 1.03.00 files.
• Classes: DEMO.COUNTER counts (65 → 68 in 3 s); TANK1.CALC.VOLUME = 100 for level 50 (traditional class); TANK1.JFLOW.sPerMin = 2 for inflow 120 (Java class); sub-item TANK1.LEVEL.MAX follows the level.
• Modbus loopback (mirror started for the test only): setpoint 1234 → readback 1234, PLC1.COMM_OK = 1; eqpdbg 0 EQPCIENG slave info: CIENG_PLC ON_SCAN, line GOOD.
• OPC UA loopback: after the two certificate moves done by the user, UA.COMM_OK = 1 (status 5), UA.SRV_STATE = 0, UA.LEVEL_COPY followed TANK1.LEVEL (62.5). While the server still rejected the client, the Boolean status item showed 0 with status 4 (ISS-080).
• Remove: 0 errors. Before/after snapshot: all datasets identical (count and name hash), no CIENG* record left. Left over and cleaned: 34 dss_*.tmp files in tls\lst (ISS-091), OPXCIENG.log, the temporary sample copy.
• Certificates: the test's files (client own certificate <host>_OPXCIENG.der/.pem, the server certificate trusted in the client store, the client certificate trusted in the server store) and the pkiserver\rejected folder created by the test were deleted with the user's approval. OPCUAC_PKI_CERTIFICATES_DF went back from 3 to 1 record by itself: the dataset follows the certificate files. The server is back in its original state.